<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes at Anonymizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/</link>
	<description>Anonymizer's Privacy Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>Hurm..... sorry to hear that. I don't recall seeing other posts, but possibly they were accidentally marked as spam by the automated system. My new-years resolution is to be more active on this blog. Events have a way of throwing me off my intended path unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurm&#8230;.. sorry to hear that. I don&#8217;t recall seeing other posts, but possibly they were accidentally marked as spam by the automated system. My new-years resolution is to be more active on this blog. Events have a way of throwing me off my intended path unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lg</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4757</link>
		<dc:creator>lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4757</guid>
		<description>Over the past month or so, I've posted a number of questions/comments, which never appeared, hence my 12/19 8:45pm comment. I'm a firm believer in good communication, which means a post that you've fallen behind provides more information than no post, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past month or so, I&#8217;ve posted a number of questions/comments, which never appeared, hence my 12/19 8:45pm comment. I&#8217;m a firm believer in good communication, which means a post that you&#8217;ve fallen behind provides more information than no post, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>We don't censor comments. Because of the amount of comment spam we do moderate posts so it may take a while for a post to appear. We will be releasing a completely re-architected version of our tools in the next couple of weeks. It will have full support for all browsers and much more. I hope you will give it a try when you get the email or see me post about it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t censor comments. Because of the amount of comment spam we do moderate posts so it may take a while for a post to appear. We will be releasing a completely re-architected version of our tools in the next couple of weeks. It will have full support for all browsers and much more. I hope you will give it a try when you get the email or see me post about it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>We fell behind schedule in the development of the new releases. They are now in testing and I will be posting about them very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We fell behind schedule in the development of the new releases. They are now in testing and I will be posting about them very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lg</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>Too bad you're censoring questions and comments. AS was a good product, but with too many questions (e.g., compatibility with FF 3.x) unanswered, you've just lost another customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you&#8217;re censoring questions and comments. AS was a good product, but with too many questions (e.g., compatibility with FF 3.x) unanswered, you&#8217;ve just lost another customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lg</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>November?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>Should be November for a update that will address all outstanding issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be November for a update that will address all outstanding issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lg</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4735</link>
		<dc:creator>lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4735</guid>
		<description>Again, any ETA for the Firefox 3.x compatible version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, any ETA for the Firefox 3.x compatible version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily, Anonymizer Support</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily, Anonymizer Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>Currently Firefox 3.0.14 is only compatible for use with Anonymous Surfing on very specific systems.  Using Windows default settings, computers with Windows 2000 and Windows XP systems that do not support Hardware-based DEP are able to use Anonymous Surfing with Firefox 3.0.14.  As this scenario describes such a small percentage of our customers and the incompatibility, when present, causes the Firefox browser to crash we have found that it is better to inform customers of the incompatibility that occurs in the vast majority of our customer base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently Firefox 3.0.14 is only compatible for use with Anonymous Surfing on very specific systems.  Using Windows default settings, computers with Windows 2000 and Windows XP systems that do not support Hardware-based DEP are able to use Anonymous Surfing with Firefox 3.0.14.  As this scenario describes such a small percentage of our customers and the incompatibility, when present, causes the Firefox browser to crash we have found that it is better to inform customers of the incompatibility that occurs in the vast majority of our customer base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/anouncements/changes-at-anonymizer/comment-page-1/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=87#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>I use Firefox v3.0.14, turn on Anonymizer, and http://www.ipchicken.com indicates the anonymized IP address.
What exactly in Anonymizer is not compatible with FireFox v3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Firefox v3.0.14, turn on Anonymizer, and <a href="http://www.ipchicken.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipchicken.com</a> indicates the anonymized IP address.<br />
What exactly in Anonymizer is not compatible with FireFox v3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
