<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google human rights accounts attacked from China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/</link>
	<description>Anonymizer's Privacy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garante</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4801</link>
		<dc:creator>Garante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4801</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s wait and see how this electronic war between this two powerful players will end up. From this google decision (made, i guess, mainly for making better their public image) hopefully will come a little turn in china censorship politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s wait and see how this electronic war between this two powerful players will end up. From this google decision (made, i guess, mainly for making better their public image) hopefully will come a little turn in china censorship politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>They are making a very bold move here. I don&#039;t think it is likely to be just to hide some security issue.

I also think it makes sense that the breach would be through phishing or malware, that seems to be the pattern lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are making a very bold move here. I don&#8217;t think it is likely to be just to hide some security issue.</p>
<p>I also think it makes sense that the breach would be through phishing or malware, that seems to be the pattern lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>Referring to Gmail accounts of activits being accessed by third parties, Google states &quot;these accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware.&quot;  Do you think Google is motivated primarily by desire to protect privacy or is their motivation more likely tied to maintaining their public image?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to Gmail accounts of activits being accessed by third parties, Google states &#8220;these accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware.&#8221;  Do you think Google is motivated primarily by desire to protect privacy or is their motivation more likely tied to maintaining their public image?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

