<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google human rights accounts attacked from China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/</link>
	<description>Anonymizer's Privacy Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garante</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4801</link>
		<dc:creator>Garante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4801</guid>
		<description>Let's wait and see how this electronic war between this two powerful players will end up. From this google decision (made, i guess, mainly for making better their public image) hopefully will come a little turn in china censorship politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s wait and see how this electronic war between this two powerful players will end up. From this google decision (made, i guess, mainly for making better their public image) hopefully will come a little turn in china censorship politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>They are making a very bold move here. I don't think it is likely to be just to hide some security issue.

I also think it makes sense that the breach would be through phishing or malware, that seems to be the pattern lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are making a very bold move here. I don&#8217;t think it is likely to be just to hide some security issue.</p>
<p>I also think it makes sense that the breach would be through phishing or malware, that seems to be the pattern lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/free-speech/google-human-rights-accounts-attacked-from-china/comment-page-1/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=135#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>Referring to Gmail accounts of activits being accessed by third parties, Google states "these accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware."  Do you think Google is motivated primarily by desire to protect privacy or is their motivation more likely tied to maintaining their public image?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to Gmail accounts of activits being accessed by third parties, Google states &#8220;these accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware.&#8221;  Do you think Google is motivated primarily by desire to protect privacy or is their motivation more likely tied to maintaining their public image?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
