<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google stands up to Korean push against anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/</link>
	<description>Anonymizer's Privacy Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>This is the first report I have heard of this issue. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will make sure the team gets to work on a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first report I have heard of this issue. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will make sure the team gets to work on a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>Google will allow search on it's web site with Anonymizer Universal running, but it blocks attempts to use the "Cached" link.

This is useful when you have a search term that may appear sparsely in a long web page.  The color coding also helps show proximity of multiple search terms.

The block says:
"We're sorry...
"... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now."

Any fix in the works, or do we have to unprotect ourselves to do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will allow search on it&#8217;s web site with Anonymizer Universal running, but it blocks attempts to use the &#8220;Cached&#8221; link.</p>
<p>This is useful when you have a search term that may appear sparsely in a long web page.  The color coding also helps show proximity of multiple search terms.</p>
<p>The block says:<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re sorry&#8230;<br />
&#8220;&#8230; but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can&#8217;t process your request right now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any fix in the works, or do we have to unprotect ourselves to do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan the survey tool guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan the survey tool guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>Well I think this is a great stand done by Google. Nice blog by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think this is a great stand done by Google. Nice blog by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>Google caved in to China</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google caved in to China</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4665</guid>
		<description>Google (aka Big Brother) is the biggest hypocrite. They track everything you do, and collect so much information on each person without their knowledge it's scary. Rest assured Google knows exactly who you are and how you spend your time and money online without you having to explicitly provide your personal info, as in Korea. 

Just look at the TOC it tried to sneakily implement with its Chrome browser that got shouted down by Internet users. Do you think Google is a charity? It is a multi-hundred-billion dollar company that is accountable to its shareholders, i.e. its primary purpose is to make money, not protect your privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google (aka Big Brother) is the biggest hypocrite. They track everything you do, and collect so much information on each person without their knowledge it&#8217;s scary. Rest assured Google knows exactly who you are and how you spend your time and money online without you having to explicitly provide your personal info, as in Korea. </p>
<p>Just look at the TOC it tried to sneakily implement with its Chrome browser that got shouted down by Internet users. Do you think Google is a charity? It is a multi-hundred-billion dollar company that is accountable to its shareholders, i.e. its primary purpose is to make money, not protect your privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/international/google-stands-up-to-korean-push-against-anonymity/comment-page-1/#comment-4660</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=110#comment-4660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;anonymity...&lt;/strong&gt;

Intriguing idea, but I don't know if I believe you one hundred percent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>anonymity&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Intriguing idea, but I don&#8217;t know if I believe you one hundred percent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
