<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymizer Survey: Anti-virus and Firewall popular but ineffective privacy protectors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivacyblog.com/online-privacy/anonymizer-survey-anti-virus-and-firewall-popular-but-ineffective-privacy-protectors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/online-privacy/anonymizer-survey-anti-virus-and-firewall-popular-but-ineffective-privacy-protectors/</link>
	<description>Anonymizer's Privacy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoWhatJohn</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/online-privacy/anonymizer-survey-anti-virus-and-firewall-popular-but-ineffective-privacy-protectors/comment-page-1/#comment-9282</link>
		<dc:creator>DoWhatJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=412#comment-9282</guid>
		<description>Sorry for Off-Topic, but just noticed that http://www.dnsleaktest.com/ reports Anonymizer Universal leaking in Windows 7 (ISP DNS listed in results).  Is this spurious or a problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for Off-Topic, but just noticed that <a href="http://www.dnsleaktest.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnsleaktest.com/</a> reports Anonymizer Universal leaking in Windows 7 (ISP DNS listed in results).  Is this spurious or a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Chaker</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivacyblog.com/online-privacy/anonymizer-survey-anti-virus-and-firewall-popular-but-ineffective-privacy-protectors/comment-page-1/#comment-9272</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Chaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivacyblog.com/?p=412#comment-9272</guid>
		<description>I agree, the basic firewall and anti-virus software doesn&#039;t do the trick these days to deter a high end hacker. I think the core issue starts with an IP address through a rotating proxy, like Anonymizer. This way it makes it difficult, if not impossible, to locate the computer behind the IP, if the hacker is constantly chasing a different IP every 15 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the basic firewall and anti-virus software doesn&#8217;t do the trick these days to deter a high end hacker. I think the core issue starts with an IP address through a rotating proxy, like Anonymizer. This way it makes it difficult, if not impossible, to locate the computer behind the IP, if the hacker is constantly chasing a different IP every 15 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

